An Integrated Neurotrauma Care Framework for the ICU: The WARM HAND Bundle
Published on: March 09, 2026
Abstract
Caring for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) demands vigilance, consistency, and coordinated action among all members of the neurocritical care team. Despite the availability of evidence-based guidelines, gaps in daily practice often arise due to complexity of neurotrauma physiology, workflow variability, and staff turnover. The WARM HAND bundle is proposed as a structured and bedside tool that brings essential domains of neurocritical care into a unified checklist. Designed to strengthen situational awareness, reduce preventable complications, and streamline communication, this framework encourages disciplined daily evaluation of neurological, physiological, and supportive-care priorities.
Introduction
Traumatic brain injury continues to pose a significant global health burden, with outcomes shaped heavily by the quality of neurocritical care delivered in the first hours and days after injury. Small lapses missed electrolyte trends, delayed recognition of neurological deterioration, or inadequate prophylaxis can have disproportionate consequences for recovery. Bundled care approaches, particularly those using mnemonics or task checklists, have shown value in enhancing reliability of ICU practice and reducing oversights in fast-paced clinical environments.¹, ² With this goal in mind, we developed WARM HAND, an eight-component bedside framework tailored specifically for neurotrauma patients. The acronym reflects the principle of a “warm handover” the active, attentive transfer of information and responsibility that ensures continuity of care across shifts and disciplines.
The WARM HAND Neurotrauma Care Bundle
WARM HAND consolidates essential daily elements of TBI management into one cohesive mnemonic. Each component represents a modifiable or monitorable factor known to influence neurological stability and functional outcomes.
W – Wakefulness & Withdrawal
Assessment of consciousness remains fundamental. Routine trending of the Glasgow Coma Scale, FOUR score, and sedation scales supports early detection of secondary injury. Motor responses particularly withdrawal or localization frequently provide the earliest sign of deterioration.
A – Airway & Arterial Gases
Airway protection and adequate gas exchange are cornerstones of neuroprotection. Intubation is generally indicated for GCS ≤ 8, and maintaining appropriate PaCO₂ and oxygenation targets mitigates risks of intracranial hypertension and hypoxemia-related injury.³
R – Reflexes & Reactivity
Brainstem reflexes including pupillary responses, corneal reflexes, and oculocephalic movements anchor neurological examinations. Consistent monitoring of these indicators helps differentiate sedation effects from true neurological decline.
M – MAP & CPP
Prevention of secondary ischemia requires strict perfusion targets. Maintaining MAP ≥ 80 mmHg and CPP 60–70 mmHg aligns with established neurotrauma standards, supporting adequate cerebral blood flow in vulnerable tissues.⁴
H – Head Positioning & Hyperosmolar Therapy
Elevation of the head to 30°, neutral neck alignment, and judicious use of mannitol or hypertonic saline remain effective first-line interventions for intracranial pressure (ICP) management. Serum osmolarity becomes an actionable daily variable when hyperosmolar therapy is in use.
A – Anticonvulsants & Analgosedation
Subclinical and non-convulsive seizures are common in TBI, justifying seizure prophylaxis and EEG monitoring when indicated. Sedation and analgesia should be titrated to minimize interference with neurological assessments while ensuring comfort.
N – Nutrition & Electrolytes
Early enteral nutrition supports metabolic demands, while careful management of sodium and other electrolytes helps prevent hyponatremia, metabolic derangements, and their impact on ICP.
D – Drain Management & DVT Prophylaxis
External ventricular drains, surgical drains, and other devices require structured monitoring to avoid blockage, over-drainage, or infection. Parallel attention to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis reduces morbidity in immobilized neurotrauma patients.⁵
Clinical Impact and Practical Advantages
The WARM HAND bundle is intended for integration into daily ICU rounds, nursing handovers, and documentation workflows. Its greatest strengths lie in:
- Standardization: Reinforces consistent attention to high-risk clinical domains across providers and shifts.
- Early Recognition: Facilitates rapid detection of neurologic or systemic deterioration, enabling timely intervention.
- Communication Efficiency: Offers a shared mental model that enhances dialogue among physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, and trainees.
- Educational Value: Serves as a practical teaching scaffold for learners developing neurocritical assessment skills.
- Quality Improvement: Supports auditing and adherence tracking through structured note-taking and rounding templates.
Although not formally studied as a research intervention, early adoption of the WARM HAND approach at our center improved uniformity of care and increased adherence to evidence-based practices. Its simplicity allows easy adaptation in resource-limited environments, aligning with the broader philosophy of pragmatic neurocritical care.
Conclusion
The WARM HAND bundle provides a concise and very practice framework for organizing bedside priorities in the ICU care of neurotrauma patients. By consolidating neurological evaluation, physiologic optimization, and supportive-care measures into a daily checklist, this approach encourages a culture of proactive, high-reliability neurocritical care. As neurotrauma systems grow more complex, such structured tools can strengthen the quality and consistency of care, ultimately improving outcomes for patients recovering from brain injury worldwide.
Author Affiliations
Luis Rafael Moscote-Salazar, MD
AV Healthcare Innovators, LLC, Madison, WI
Vishal Chavda, MS, PhD
Department of Medicine and Critical Care, Multispecialty, Trauma and ICCU Center, Sardar Hospital, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
Department of Neurology, Neuroendovascular Division, Leonard Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
Creed M Stary, MD, PhD
Associate Professor of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, CA, USA
cstary@stanford.edu
Tariq Janjua, MD
Neurocritical Care Medicine, National Brain Aneurysm Center, Minneapolis, MN
Stefano Maria Priola, MD
Department of Neurosurgery, Northern Ontario School of Medicine University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
References
- Escamilla-Ocañas CE, Torrealba-Acosta G, Mandava P, Qasim MS, Gutiérrez-Flores B, Bershad E, Hirzallah M, Rao CP, Damani R. Implementation of systematic safety checklists in a neurocritical care unit: a quality improvement study. BMJ Open Quality. 2022 Dec 1;11(4):e001824.
- Sarpong Y, Nattanmai P, Schelp G, Bell R, Premkumar K, Stapleton E, McCormick A, Newey CR. Improvement in quality metrics outcomes and patient and family satisfaction in a neurosciences intensive care unit after creation of a dedicated neurocritical care team. Critical Care Research and Practice. 2017;2017(1):6394105.
- Carney N, Totten AM, O'Reilly C, Ullman JS, Hawryluk GW, Bell MJ, Bratton SL, Chesnut R, Harris OA, Kissoon N, Rubiano AM. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 1;80(1):6-15.
- Oddo M, Poole D, Helbok R, Meyfroidt G, Stocchetti N, Bouzat P, Cecconi M, Geeraerts T, Martin-Loeches I, Quintard H, Taccone FS. Fluid therapy in neurointensive care patients: ESICM consensus and clinical practice recommendations. Intensive care medicine. 2018 Apr;44(4):449-63.
- Robba C, McCredie V, Chesnut RM, Citerio G, Gauss T, Hawryluk GW, Helbok R, Meyfroidt G, Newcombe V, Sarwal A, Taccone FS. Traumatic brain injury management in the intensive care unit: standard of care and knowledge gaps. Intensive Care Medicine. 2025 Jun 16:1-6.
- Murray NM, Joshi AN, Kronfeld K, Hobbs K, Bernier E, Hirsch KG, Gold CA. A standardized checklist improves the transfer of stroke patients from the neurocritical care unit to hospital ward. The Neurohospitalist. 2020 Apr;10(2):100-8.